What is cool with those machines (2 models available, 1x 2,3GHz, 1x 2,6GHz) is that you still can replace all the These are approved with PT12 and even recommended by Avid. Imo you should not invest $1400.- in a recent Mini for Pro Tools because there is no Quad Core processorĪvailable in any recent Mini and Pro Tools 11/12 definitely want a Quad Core for a decent multicore performance.Īs mentioned by the others the most affordable yet perfectly working with PT11/12 Mac you can get is one of theĢ012 i7 Quad Core Minis. Get better.Intel Integrated Graphic brings Pro Tools to it's knees So I advice you to wait for a while with buying new Mac. This fall new Macs will be released with better hardware and the new OS X Mavericks will roll out with performance (CPU and memory) improvements (more free RAM for FCPX). Video editing is more aboutĨ Gb of RAM is enough for working with projects. Quad-core processor will not matter when integrated graphics will render every frame for 2 seconds. HD 4000 is a bit less powerful than NVIDIA 610M. IMac has discrete NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M adapter with dedicated memory, while Mac Mini has integrated Intel HD Graphics 4000 card. But I don't want to regret the purchase a year from now!Īctually, the most important hardware component in video rendering is videocard (GPU). If I can spend $900 dollars instead of $1300 I can eat next month (that's a joke - it's not THAT bad). So any advice would be GREATLY appreciated. I have done some, but the answers vary greatly. I'm sorry, I know it's a very loooong question and it seems like I've done no research on my own. I'm likely going to need this computer to do the job for quite a while! So I know that for now the software I'm using doesn't really make use of multiple cores, but newer software will right? Other than security, is there a big difference between the i5 and i7? Also, I don't need to start tomorrow, so what is the rumour mill saying about new release dates? Will new iMacs have Retina displays? I've checked a bunch of rumour sites but nobody has any RELIABLE information. However LONGEVITY is as big a concern as cost. I'm one of those rabid Apple lovers so I'd obviously prefer the iMac, but I can't spend an extra couple of hundred dollars just because it'll look better on my desk. Quad Core? I could get the 2.5GHz Dual Core Mini for only $600, and then add the extra RAM. Would I need to add RAM to the Mini? Will the Mini support an IPS monitor and ALSO an HDMI monitor as a preview screen? How much difference is Dual Core vs. For the most part, data would be on external USB 3 drives. I don't need to have both programs open at the same time, so multi-tasking isn't a big consideration. I know I'll have to learn FCPX at some point.but one thing at a time. At least for now I'd be running Pro Tools 8 and FCP Studio. I know both monitors would be the same resolution and the iMac monitor would probably look better, but I don't know which computer is better suited to my current needs. Keeping in mind that cost is absolutely a consideration, I'm looking at a Mac Mini 2.3GHz i7 Quad Core 4GB RAM ( or 2.5GHz i5 Dual Core 8GB RAM) and a 24" Dell IPS HD monitor or an iMac 2.7GHz i5 Quad Core 8GB RAM 21.5". I'd like to start trying to at least do a bit of freelance work but my MacBook Pro 2.2GHz Core 2 Duo just doesn't have the muscle any more. I've been a post production recording engineer and sound editor for 20 years, but for the last 4 I've been on disability because of arthritis and Crohn's Disease and so I haven't been keeping up on the technology. I apologize in advance if this is a dumb question.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |